|
Samye
was the first monastery to be built in Tibet. It was probably founded during the
770's under the patronage of King Trisong Detsen, with the work being directed
by Padmasambhava and Shantarakshita, the two Indian masters that the king had
invited to Tibet. The monastery is designed on the plan of the Odantapuri temple
in India (present-day Bihar), and mirrors the structure of the universe according
to Buddhist cosmology. The central temple represents Mt. Sumeru, the mythical
mountain at the centre of the cosmos. Around it are four temples called 'ling',
which represent the four continents (ling) situated in the vast ocean to the north,
south, east, and west of Sumeru. To the right and left of each of these are smaller
temples, called 'ling-tren', representing sub-continents. Four great stupas, in
four colours (white, red, blue and green) stood
facing the (south-east, south-west, north-west, and north-east, respectively)
corners of the main temple, andare being reconstructed. Near the North (Jangchub
Semkye) ling, is a protector chapel, Pehar Kordzoling, adorned with unusual mural
work featuring skulls. One ling-tren, the Dragyur Gyagar Ling (South-South-West)
was established for the sole purpose of translating sutras. Beyond its front entrance
is an idyllic courtyard, planted with flowers, trees, and bamboo.
When
the monastery was first built, both Indian and Chinese monks were invited there
to work on the translation of Buddhist scriptures from their respective languages
into Tibetan. The Indians lived in the Aryapalo (Hayagriva) Ling temple to the
south, and the Chinese in the Jampa (Maitreya) Ling to the west. Conflicts arose
between the two factions concerning doctrinal interpretation, and the king called
for a public debateto settle the matter. This took place around 792, between Kamalashila,
adisciple of Shantarakshita, and Hoshang. The debate, which took place in the
Jampa Ling, was presided over
by Trisong Detsen, and was intended to establish which form of Buddhism should
prevail in Tibet: the Indian monastic tradition of systematic study, firm adherence
to ethical rules, and a practice that entails the gradual ascendance of stages
leading to enlightenment; or the Chinese tradition of Ch'an (Zen), which favours
a direct ('sudden') breakthrough to the ultimate nature of consciousness and existence,
for which intellect and morality, the twin pillars of the Indian school, are not
necessary, and can even be hindrances. The accounts of the outcome of the debate
are ambiguous, both sides claiming victory. The actual outcome, though, is beyond
doubt: The Indian view was favoured, and from then on the Chinese influence waned.
Hoshang had to leave Tibet, and the Ch'an tradition was effectively proscribed.
| |